Thursday, October 18, 2007

Rudy's Bomber


Norman Podhoretz is a New York neo-conservative columnist who advocates a pre-emptive military strike against Iran, for fear that Iran will build a nuclear weapon some day and threaten the western world. He acknowledges this could create a huge backlash of anti-Americanism world wide. But, he says, it is worth it.

Podhoretz is Rudy Guliani's senior foreign policy advisor.

You can read his "Case for Bombing Iran" here.

Podhoretz openly advocates what he calls World War IV (III being the cold war) and makes analogies to Adolf Hitler when referencing Iranian's nutty president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Podheretz is quick to point out that the Iranian leader's agenda is to first "wipe out" Israel.

I suppose it is not surprising that a Jewish neo-conservative from New York would be advocating the U.S. save Israel by bombing an Islamic country; nor surprising that Guliani would be the presidential candidate listening to this guy.

So, if you are tired of this war in Iraq, but want another, then vote for Rudy.

On the other hand if you think Podhoretz is a warmongerer (and that such is a bad thing), then you will only vote for Rudy if you have lost your mind. If Rudy wins, then we all will be losing a lot more: many thousands more of our young men and women in a purposeless and unnecessary war.

-- Mike

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Agreed -- what was the point of Petraeus' testimony?

An excellent editorial in the Sept. 10 Oklahoma Daily:

http://hub.ou.edu/articles/article.php?item_id=1939381827&section_id=398493765

An excerpt:

Optimism about Iraq is hard to come by, though Petraeus hoped to engender it with his remarks yesterday. Instead, he exposed how irrelevant America has become in Iraq.

Saturday, September 1, 2007

The Craig lesson

I wonder about the state of our nation when a United States senator is railroaded from office (by his own party) for brushing his hand against a bathroom stall at an airport. Of course I am talking about Sen. Larry Craig, the Idaho Republican and NRA board memer, who resigned todayunder pressure over his misdemeanor conviction of lewd conduct, under the suspicion that he is homosexual.

Craig denied he was gay on Tuesday. Party bosses were concerned that his apparent plan to fight the criticism of his misdemanor plea bargain last June in Minneapolis would hurt Republicans in upcoming elections. Do they really think his resignation will somehow erase any negative impact this might have?

I listened to the audio tape of the police interrogation of Sen. Craig when he was arrested. What struck me was not the senator's explanation of events -- frankly, it seemed plausible and clearly established a reasonable doubt -- but rather the heavy handedness of the arresting officer who tried to cajole a confession from Craig. It made NYPD Blue's Andy Sipowicz's techniques look like those of a school girl.

(Note: The evidence cited by police in support of their charge that Craig was soliciting an undercover officer for sex included their statement that Craig entered the toilet stall and positioned his carry-on luggage behind the bathroom stall door, so that no one from outside could see underneath it. This absurd conclusion ignores the fact that almost all air travelers do the same, because there is no where else to put it when one needs to take a crap at an airport. Leaving it outside only results in police confiscating the "abandoned" bag, blowing it up on some firing range and arresting the owner for violating some TSA rule).

It was apparent on the audio tape that the police officer used Sen. Craig's status -- and obvious fear that the arrest would harm him politically, to convince him to plead guilty to a lesser misdemeanor charge. The officer repeatedly told Craig he would not go to the news media about it. But it was clear to both the interrogator and the interrogatee that Craig's political career held in the balance, and under this pressure Craig pleaded guilty to what amounted to a traffic ticket.

Of course such things do not go unnoticed. And two months later the plea comes to light. Craig resigns because of politics. But was the public served by his resignation -- or merely the whims of party bosses?

I don't think so. If Sen. Craig was good enough to serve Idahoans before June, then a misunderstanding over a bump of feet or reaching for a piece of toilet paper in a crowded airport bathroom surely does not make him unfit for office afterward. I don't care whether he's as gay as Rock Hudson.

The homophobic nature of many Americans causes us to believe gay men are sexual predators. The actions of the Republican party to run Craig out of office -- whether he is gay or not -- is disappointing, because it does nothing but perpetuate that myth. And more imporantly to me, it merely shows that getting elected, or re-elected is more important to political leaders in America today, than governing.